12 November 2010

There Is a Difference between Needing to Divide and Loving to Divide

'Avoid foolish controversies, genealogies, dissensions, and quarrels about the law, for they are unprofitable and worthless.' --Titus 3:9

Bryan Chapell wisely comments:
We struggle with these commands to 'avoid . . . dissensions' because we know there are things worth disputing, and because it seems divisive to separate from divisive people.

Two perspectives may help.

First, Paul is speaking about ministry priorities. His words require us to examine whether controversy and argument about secondary issues become primary concerns in our ministries. If so, then our priorities require realignment.

Second, there is a difference between needing to divide and loving to divide. A divisive person loves to fight. The differences are usually observable. A person who loves the peace and purity of the church may be forced into division, but it is not his character. He enters arguments regrettably and infrequently. When forced to argue, he remains fair, truthful, and loving in his responses. He grieves to have to disagree with a brother. Those who are divisive by nature lust for the fray, incite its onset, and delight in being able to conquer another person.
--R. Kent Hughes and Bryan Chapell, 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus: To Guard the Deposit (Crossway, 2000), 364

1 comment:

  1. This illustrates how we can "obey" the Bible with such an uncomprehending attitude of the heart that it all nets out as disobedience, and an especially distasteful betrayal for its claim to fidelity.

    ReplyDelete